<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renault&#8217;s shark-fin engine cover is ridiculous</title>
	<link>http://www.gridcrasher.com/index.php/2008/04/16/renaults-shark-fin-engine-cover-is-ridiculous</link>
	<description>F1 Motor Race Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Williams test 2009 wing package &#124; Gridcrasher - Motor Sports</title>
		<link>http://www.gridcrasher.com/index.php/2008/04/16/renaults-shark-fin-engine-cover-is-ridiculous#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>Williams test 2009 wing package &#124; Gridcrasher - Motor Sports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gridcrasher.com/index.php/2008/04/16/renaults-shark-fin-engine-cover-is-ridiculous#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>[...] Although it&#8217;s not the highest-quality picture, we like what we see - especially the tall rear wing, which harks back to a different era in F1. The new rules for 2009, which require teams to simplify the design of aero parts, will certainly result in better-looking cars than we saw in 2008 (remember this monstrosity). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Although it&#8217;s not the highest-quality picture, we like what we see - especially the tall rear wing, which harks back to a different era in F1. The new rules for 2009, which require teams to simplify the design of aero parts, will certainly result in better-looking cars than we saw in 2008 (remember this monstrosity). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
